Compare: Disney Picture Dictionary vs. Illustrated Pocket Dictionary

Compare: to
Disney Picture Dictionary (disney Learning) Kingfisher Illustrated Pocket Dictionary
4 Star Reviews 4 Star Reviews
Disney Picture Dictionary
Illustrated Pocket Dictionary
Price: $21.00 Price: $4.26
Author: Thea Feldman Author: Editors of Kingfisher

Disney Picture Dictionary by Thea Feldman is the right child's dictionary. Written by Thea Feldman and it was published sometime in October of 2003 by Disney Press. The dictionary is concerning Picture dictionaries, English and is considered outstanding juvenile literature. This is the 1st ed. of Disney Picture Dictionary is 142 pages long and it offers artistically colored illustrations. It focuses on Vocabulary, Picture dictionaries and English language. The child's book dimensions are 12.25" Height x 9.83" Length x 0.5" Width. It weighs roughly 1.73 lbs.


For anyone searching for a dictionary We've come up with some facts. You may want to read Kingfisher Illustrated Pocket Dictionary written by Editors of Kingfisher. The author is Editors of Kingfisher and it was published on the 12th of September, 2007 by Kingfisher. The children's book has 231 pages. To get your own copy of this book, visit our affilate button on this site.

Manufacturer: Disney Press Manufacturer: Kingfisher
ISBN: 0786833858 ISBN:
UPC: 725961033859 UPC:
EAN: 9780786833856 EAN:
SKU: 903878438 SKU: 9780753461167
Release Date: 2003-10-02 Release Date: 2007-09-12
Publication Date: 2003-10-01 Publication Date: 2007-09-12
Binding: Hardcover Binding: Paperback
Pages: 142 Pages: 231
Format: Format: Bargain Price
Height: 12.25" Height:
Length: 9.83" Length:
Width: 0.5" Width:
Weight: 1.73 lbs. Weight:
Package Height: 0.47" Package Height: 0.7"
Package Length: 11.97" Package Length: 7.4"
Package Width: 9.76" Package Width: 5.2"
Package Weight: 1.59 lbs. Package Weight: 0.7 lbs.
[View Product] [View Product]

Comparison results for Disney Picture Dictionary (disney Learning) and Kingfisher Illustrated Pocket Dictionary. Which is better?